In the early twentieth century, the eugenics movement won many supporters with its promise that social ills such as venereal disease, alcoholism, and so-called feeble-mindedness, along with many other conditions, could be eliminated by selective human breeding and other measures. The provinces of Alberta and British Columbia passed legislation requiring that certain “unfit” individuals undergo reproductive sterilization. Ontario, being home to many leading proponents of eugenics, came close to doing the same.

In the Public Good examines three legal processes that were used to advance eugenic ideas in Ontario between 1910 and 1938: legislative bills, provincial royal commissions, and the criminal trial of a young woman accused of distributing birth control information. Taken together, they reveal who in the province supported these ideas, how they were understood in relation to the public good, and how they were debated. Elizabeth Koester shows the ways in which the law was used both to promote and to deflect eugenics, and how the concept of the public good was used by supporters to add power to their cause.

With eugenic thinking finding new footholds in the possibilities offered by reproductive technologies, proposals to link welfare entitlement to “voluntary” sterilization, and concerns about immigration, In the Public Good adds depth to our understanding. Its exploration of the historical relationship between eugenics and law in Ontario prepares us to face the implications of “newgenics” today.

In the Public Good examines the trajectory of eugenic ideas in Ontario in the early twentieth century, when the eugenics movement gained support for the solutions it offered to social ills of the day. Koester focuses on key legal events that influenced eugenic ideas, showing how the law was used both to promote and deflect eugenic thinking.

“In the Public Good is an engaging historical study into why Ontario ultimately did not pass eugenic legislation despite active and publicized support for eugenic solutions. Koester’s study achieves everything it sets out to accomplish, a sometimes rare feat in academia, and sets a new standard for exploring the connections between eugenics and law.” H-Sci-Med-Tech

“Elizabeth Koester's examination of parliamentary debates and legal cases concerning eugenic policy in Ontario between 1910 and 1938 is grounded in the tension between notions of the public good and individual freedom, a debate that remains relevant and contentious in discussions regarding how best to address issues of public concern.… Detailed and precise, Koester's text will be useful to anyone interested in the work and efforts of eugenicists during early twentieth‐century North America, and to those interested in the ways in which issues of public interest are debated and legislated.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences

"Studies of eugenics in Canada have primarily focused on Alberta and British Columbia. Koester convincingly demonstrates that eugenic enthusiasm and activity was also robust in Ontario, thus contributing to both the history of Canadian eugenics and to wider debates over how best to assess eugenics' popularity." Diane B. Paul, University of Massachusetts Boston

“In the Public Good should be required reading for every graduate student considering the history of eugenics in Canada as well as for those already in the field. Koester adds to the growing historiography of eugenics in Canada with this solid contribution and offers a road map for other historians interested in regionalized histories of eugenics.” Canadian Historical Review

"In the Public Good challenges narrow views of the role of law in Canada's eugenic project by addressing different ways that legal institutions and norms were brought to bear on social problems." Eric H. Reiter, Concordia University and author of Wounded Feelings: Litigating Emotions in Quebec, 1870-1950